On Fr, 09 Mär 2012, Frank Küster wrote:
> > I have now added some (UNTESTED) code that:
> > - checks for md5sum changes and removes only if unchanged, otherwise
> > simply renames it
>
> You can use ucf for that:
>
> ucfq /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf | grep \
> '/etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fr, 09 Mär 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> for i in $UCF_FILES ; do
>> rm -f $i
>> ucf --purge $i
>> if test -x "`which ucfr`" ; then
>> ucfr --purge tex-common $i
>> fi
>> done
>
> Well (with small bugs) that does it, but it i
On 09.03.12 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On Do, 08 Mär 2012, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > The reason is that the files aren't under dpkg's control, but under
> > ucf's instead. Therefore we need to manually
>
> Yes, see first item in svn texlive2012/TODO:
> - removal of not-real
On Fr, 09 Mär 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> for i in $UCF_FILES ; do
> rm -f $i
> ucf --purge $i
> if test -x "`which ucfr`" ; then
> ucfr --purge tex-common $i
> fi
> done
Well (with small bugs) that does it, but it is brutal, since it removes
even if som
Hi Frank,
On Do, 08 Mär 2012, Frank Küster wrote:
> The reason is that the files aren't under dpkg's control, but under
> ucf's instead. Therefore we need to manually
> - remove the files along with ucf-new or however they might be called
> - ucf --purge the files
> - ucfr --purge the files.
Wo
On Do, 08 Mär 2012, Frank Küster wrote:
> The reason is that the files aren't under dpkg's control, but under
> ucf's instead. Therefore we need to manually
Yes, see first item in svn texlive2012/TODO:
- removal of not-really-conffiles in /etc/texmf/texmf.d and
/etc/texmf.d/updmapd./00..., prob
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> Package: tex-common
> Version: 3.0
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I have a little VM, which had never tex-common installed. Today I installed
> the version 2.10 from unstable and then upgraded to 3.0 from experimental.
> Attached is the screen output. Maybe th
Package: tex-common
Version: 3.0
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have a little VM, which had never tex-common installed. Today I installed
the version 2.10 from unstable and then upgraded to 3.0 from experimental.
Attached is the screen output. Maybe the 3.0 version expects other checksums
fo
8 matches
Mail list logo
