Bug#660212: Emperor support

2012-07-04 Thread Ole Laursen
Hi! I see your point about churn in uwsgi, and maybe it's not the right time right now, but I do think in the long run that Emperor watching a directory is actually a bit more friendly than the impressive init scripting since you can read up on how it works on the uwsgi page and tutorials on the w

Bug#660212: Emperor support

2012-07-03 Thread Janoš Guljaš
Hi Ole, Emperor is one of the possible ways to manage uWSGI apps and it is a nice one. But, not every setup needs Emperor mode, and managing applications can be done without it. If it is needed, it can be configured with a simple configuration which will include Emperor. There are various ways/mo

Bug#660212: Emperor support

2012-07-03 Thread Ole Laursen
Hi! Allow me to second this. While the setup installed by the package is neat, it looks like the Emperor is the upstream idea of how to do this, and it also makes babysitting the thing a bit easier: http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/SystemdIntegration I think it would be neat if the package sh