Bug#659632: graphite-web

2013-03-13 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, > Looking at the two rejections > > * webapp/content/js/ext/examples/shared/icons/fam/* are licensed under > CC-BY-3.0 > * webapp/content/js/ext/resources/*.swf lack corresponding source code. > > and dealing with the flash issue first. Without knowing in detail how > central the .swf f

Bug#659632: graphite-web

2013-03-13 Thread Gary Wright
Looking at the two rejections * webapp/content/js/ext/examples/shared/icons/fam/* are licensed under CC-BY-3.0 * webapp/content/js/ext/resources/*.swf lack corresponding source code. and dealing with the flash issue first. Without knowing in detail how central the .swf files are to functionality,

Bug#659632: graphite-web

2013-02-19 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Hey, So apparently graphite-web is not in NEW right now. It's also not in the archive. Is this intentional? Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hofstaedtler | design, deploy, scale http://christian.hofstaedtler.name/ | phone +43 720 699846 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-di

Bug#659632: graphite-web

2013-02-19 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, > So apparently graphite-web is not in NEW right now. It's also not in > the archive. > > Is this intentional? graphite-web was rejected on Sunday from archive: * webapp/content/js/ext/examples/shared/icons/fam/* are licensed under CC-BY-3.0 * webapp/content/js/ext/resources/*.swf lack c