Hi.
I guess I'm a little confused. Why would it not make sense to make a
so.1 symlink to the .so.1.1.1 library? I don't see why one would want
them to differ. The 0.8 symlink could remain right?
Chris
On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Chris Morgan writes:
>
>> From the d
Chris Morgan writes:
> From the debian runtime library document, shouldn't there be a symlink
> to the latest version of the library?
Yes, there is one:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.0.8 -> libpcap.so.1.2.1
> And isn't that something in the 1.x series? Is the version not 1.x?
The vers
Package: libpcap0.8
Version: 1.1.1-8
Severity: important
File: libpcap
I'm the developer of SharpPcap, a c# library that interacts with libpcap.
Noticed that it wasn't working
on my system because the mapping from windows dll to linux dll was broken.
Previously I was able to map
from wpcap to l
3 matches
Mail list logo
