Bug#656955: mkfs.btrfs broken on armel

2012-06-21 Thread shawn
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 09:41 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 06/15/2012 09:02 AM, shawn wrote: > > Yes it is, but here is a patch to fix it :-) > > great, thanks. > OOPS! That patch broke all architectures where size of pointer != 4 --- !=8 + memcpy(offset, &t, sizeof(

Bug#656955: mkfs.btrfs broken on armel

2012-06-21 Thread shawn
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 09:41 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 06/15/2012 09:02 AM, shawn wrote: > > Yes it is, but here is a patch to fix it :-) > > great, thanks. > OOPS! That patch broke all architectures where size of pointer != 4 + memcpy(offset, &t, sizeof(&offset))

Bug#656955: mkfs.btrfs broken on armel

2012-06-15 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 06/15/2012 09:02 AM, shawn wrote: > Yes it is, but here is a patch to fix it :-) great, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/

Bug#656955: mkfs.btrfs broken on armel

2012-06-15 Thread shawn
tag 656955 patch -moreinfo On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:07 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > tag 656955 moreinfo > thanks > > is this still the case with 0.19+20120328? > Yes it is, but here is a patch to fix it :-) -- -Shawn Landden >From f1a105a8689a1e037c74476978205f12cf4a3fd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

Bug#656955: mkfs.btrfs broken on armel

2012-06-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 656955 moreinfo thanks is this still the case with 0.19+20120328? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t