Hi,
adrian15 wrote (15 Apr 2012 09:25:08 GMT) :
> El 09/04/12 19:28, Daniel Baumann escribió:
>> what i don't get is why the thing is mounted in /root/live/$whatever in
>> the first place if it is unmounted their afterwards anyway.
>>
>> or in other words: there should be nothing interfering with
El 09/04/12 19:28, Daniel Baumann escribió:
what i don't get is why the thing is mounted in /root/live/$whatever in
the first place if it is unmounted their afterwards anyway.
or in other words: there should be nothing interfering with /root/*
unless it's staying there after the initramfs->real
El 09/04/12 19:28, Daniel Baumann escribió:
what i don't get is why the thing is mounted in /root/live/$whatever in
the first place if it is unmounted their afterwards anyway.
or in other words: there should be nothing interfering with /root/*
unless it's staying there after the initramfs->real
what i don't get is why the thing is mounted in /root/live/$whatever in
the first place if it is unmounted their afterwards anyway.
or in other words: there should be nothing interfering with /root/*
unless it's staying there after the initramfs->real-system switch, so
the temporary mounting shoul
adrian15 wrote (09 Apr 2012 16:33:11 GMT) :
> I have tested it (toram and findiso boot parametres together) and
> I suppose it works ok because:
Thanks, applied.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.
El 09/04/12 09:46, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (08 Apr 2012 20:54:39 GMT) :
But according to current fromiso implementation it would seem that
you have to check exactly the same directory as the one
you're umounting.
I'm not very sure about this reasoning so please take my patch
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (08 Apr 2012 20:54:39 GMT) :
> But according to current fromiso implementation it would seem that
> you have to check exactly the same directory as the one
> you're umounting.
> I'm not very sure about this reasoning so please take my patch
> with caution.
Looks great, but may
El 08/04/12 20:33, intrigeri escribió:
tags 656135 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote (08 Apr 2012 11:29:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
Applied in Git, with a few improvements as follow-up commits.
Thanks adrian15!
Cheers,
While trying to improve fromiso/isofrom opti
El 08/04/12 20:33, intrigeri escribió:
tags 656135 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote (08 Apr 2012 11:29:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
Applied in Git, with a few improvements as follow-up commits.
Thanks adrian15!
Cheers,
The changes seem fine to me.
Thank you! Let
tags 656135 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote (08 Apr 2012 11:29:28 GMT) :
> intrigeri, ack for applying it?
Applied in Git, with a few improvements as follow-up commits.
Thanks adrian15!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.as
El 08/04/12 13:29, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/08/2012 12:50 PM, adrian15 wrote:
I rewrote the patch with your pieces of advice implemented.
looks good to me, thanks for you patience with it.
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
This is another patch that would complement the first one.
It
On 04/08/2012 12:50 PM, adrian15 wrote:
> I rewrote the patch with your pieces of advice implemented.
looks good to me, thanks for you patience with it.
intrigeri, ack for applying it?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-tech
El 08/04/12 07:11, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/08/2012 12:19 AM, adrian15 wrote:
I rewrote the patch according to intrigeri wishes and with some pieces
of advice from Daniel.
but now you did worsen it a bit compared to the last iteration :)
* use 'mkdir -p /live/findiso' instead of 'mk
On 04/08/2012 12:19 AM, adrian15 wrote:
> I rewrote the patch according to intrigeri wishes and with some pieces
> of advice from Daniel.
but now you did worsen it a bit compared to the last iteration :)
* use 'mkdir -p /live/findiso' instead of 'mkdir /live/findiso -p'
for consistency.
El 07/04/12 20:36, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (07 Apr 2012 17:14:08 GMT) :
This is the alternate patch then.
I'm fine with the reasons Daniel provided against using mountpoint in
live-boot, but I still don't consider "grep -q /live/findiso
/proc/mounts" as a robust way to check t
On 04/07/2012 09:28 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Moving /bin/mountpoint to another, better suited package would
> be great.
i'll open a bug on sysvinit for that.
> However, I would not like to see the current effort of getting findiso
> into live-boot, to be stalled by the outcome of this move.
sure.
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote (07 Apr 2012 19:02:38 GMT) :
> alternatively, we could ask to move mountpoint from initscripts to
> util-linux, though, that might take a very long time to accomplish.
Moving /bin/mountpoint to another, better suited package would
be great.
However, I would not like to s
On 04/07/2012 08:36 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> I think we need to use something similar to mountpoint but written in
> shell, that is either parse /proc/mounts, or copy the way
> /bin/mountpoint works (its algorithm boils down comparing if the
> major:minor matches the ones of the parent directory).
a
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (07 Apr 2012 17:14:08 GMT) :
> This is the alternate patch then.
I'm fine with the reasons Daniel provided against using mountpoint in
live-boot, but I still don't consider "grep -q /live/findiso
/proc/mounts" as a robust way to check that /root/live/findiso (or
/live/findiso?)
On 04/07/2012 07:04 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> May I ask why?
sure.
there are two reasons, mainly:
first, it clutters the system uselessly. it seems overkill to me to need
the whole initscripts package just for that single program. granted,
initscripts is not a really huge package.
second, i prefer
El 07/04/12 18:29, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 04/07/2012 04:06 PM, adrian15 wrote:
I am supposing that mountpoint is an standard command that comes with
Debian standard packages and thus you don't have to edit any
build-depends variable on the package definition.
it would be a depends, not a
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote (07 Apr 2012 16:29:32 GMT) :
> /bin/mountpoint is part of initscripts from sysvinit. i'm afraid we
> cannot use this - a depends on initscripts is too invasive for
> systems running alternative init systems (systemd, upstart, etc).
May I ask why?
System-V's /sbin/init is
On 04/07/2012 04:06 PM, adrian15 wrote:
> I am supposing that mountpoint is an standard command that comes with
> Debian standard packages and thus you don't have to edit any
> build-depends variable on the package definition.
it would be a depends, not a build-depends. the initrd is build on the
El 07/04/12 09:22, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 18:39:46 GMT) :
I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
that intrigeri pointed out at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/msg00067.html
So you have replaced
grep -q /live/findiso
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 18:39:46 GMT) :
>>> I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
>>> that intrigeri pointed out at:
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/msg00067.html
>>
>> So you have replaced
>>
>>grep -q /live/findiso /proc/mounts&& umount
El 06/04/12 20:21, intrigeri escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 17:23:45 GMT) :
I think I've finally managed to make the patch.
Thank you.
I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
that intrigeri pointed out at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/m
Hi,
adrian15 wrote (06 Apr 2012 17:23:45 GMT) :
> I think I've finally managed to make the patch.
Thank you.
> I've even improved the part about checking that the iso was mounted
> that intrigeri pointed out at:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/09/msg00067.html
So you have replaced
El 16/01/12 22:04, Daniel Baumann escribió:
retitle 656135 support findiso functionality
tag 656135 moreinfo
thanks
On 01/16/2012 08:02 PM, Adrian Gibanel Lopez wrote:
* Discussion of findiso option and other boot parametres in debian-live mailing
list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011
retitle 656135 support findiso functionality
tag 656135 moreinfo
thanks
On 01/16/2012 08:02 PM, Adrian Gibanel Lopez wrote:
> * Discussion of findiso option and other boot parametres in debian-live
> mailing
> list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/07/msg00146.html
after that mail end of
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~a24-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I am trying to loop-mount-and-boot a debian-live-iso from grub2.
Grub2 has loop-mount capabilities so it can do it.
It seems that Grml, a debian live derivative has already this feature and
they name it: findiso.
Some
30 matches
Mail list logo
