This is resolved upstream. New upstream configuration sports a systemd
service setup + lirc_options.conf instead of hardware.conf. These are
classic configuration files with no specific handling which is supposed
to resolve this issue.
The downside is of course the breakage caused by not support
Control: tags -1 squeeze wheezy
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:16:26PM +, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Anyway, as the postinst in wheezy does not appear to modify the config
> > file, it appears that further upgrades should not have this problem.
> > Given that the bug was tagged squeez
Hi
On Sunday 23 March 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Some time ago you committed:
>
> r497 | slh-guest | 2012-02-23 12:20:25 + (Thu, 23 Feb 2012) | 1 line
>
> detection stages (Closes: #660956).
>
> Index: debian/changelog
> ==
Some time ago you committed:
r497 | slh-guest | 2012-02-23 12:20:25 + (Thu, 23 Feb 2012) | 1 line
detection stages (Closes: #660956).
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(revision 496)
+++ debian/changelog(
control: tag -1 -patch
Current patch needs more work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Note to RT: this is about adding a wheezy-ignore tag for #655969]
Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 17:27:33, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On Friday 08 March 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 03:32:29, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> […]
>
> > > On Thursday 07
Hi
On Friday 08 March 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 03:32:29, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
[…]
> > On Thursday 07 March 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
[…]
> > Thanks for looking into this bug, the patch itself is correct and will
> > avoid the reported piuparts up
gt; reported bug. However your proposed nmudiff won't interfere with those
> for-jessie changes and I'd appreciate if you could upload it.
If lirc is always installed to be used (never pulled by a Recommends), then
tag it wheezy-ignore is probably the best approach indeed.
Thanks for the background.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Regards
> Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=14;bug=655969
Best regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ver your proposed nmudiff won't interfere with those
for-jessie changes and I'd appreciate if you could upload it.
Thanks a lot.
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=14;bug=655969
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Updated patch with (much) more comments.
Thomas
diff -Nru lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog
--- lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog 2011-03-06 22:16:30.0 +0100
+++ lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog 2013-03-07 16:58:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lirc (0.9.
How many times will I forget to attach a file?
Sorry.
Thomas
diff -Nru lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog
--- lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog 2011-03-06 22:16:30.0 +0100
+++ lirc-0.9.0~pre1/debian/changelog 2013-02-12 18:25:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10
tags 655969 + patch
thanks
Le samedi 26 janvier 2013 19:22:23, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:34:08AM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Thanks for the notice, while I don't exactly share that severity
> > classification (although that is of course covered by the
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 18:22 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:34:08AM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Thanks for the notice, while I don't exactly share that severity
> > classification (although that is of course covered by the policy text),
> > I'll work on
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:34:08AM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Thanks for the notice, while I don't exactly share that severity
> classification (although that is of course covered by the policy text),
> I'll work on this as soon as possible.
Ping? It's been a year, and with a popcon
Hi
On Tuesday 17 January 2012, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: lirc
> Version: 0.9.0~pre1-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
> upgrade
> test because dpkg detected a c
15 matches
Mail list logo
