On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 00:04:43 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> But in tarantool I can't do so because tarantool uses old versions of
> lua. Upstream has plans to migrate to current version, but it just is
> a plan.
>
You can at least make it so the timestamps aren't confused. There's
this t
Severity 655801 normal
thanks
>>> so make decides that it needs to rebuild buildvm_ppcspe.h, which fails.
>>
>>> I don't know why it's the case on my system but not on yours, but I also do
>>> not
>>> see any reason why this should not happen.
>>
>> I don't know, too. May be You use some build
On 20/04/12 at 23:34 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > What happens on my system is that buildvm_ppc.dasc is newer than
> > buildvm_ppcspe.h:
>
> > (unstable-amd64-sbuild)root@ip-10-250-219-242:~/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src#
> > stat buildvm_ppcspe.h buildvm_ppc.
> What happens on my system is that buildvm_ppc.dasc is newer than
> buildvm_ppcspe.h:
> (unstable-amd64-sbuild)root@ip-10-250-219-242:~/tarantool-1.4.4+20120127/build-area/third_party/luajit/src#
> stat buildvm_ppcspe.h buildvm_ppc.dasc ../dynasm/dynasm.lua
> File: `buildvm_ppcspe.h'
> Size: 895
On 20/04/12 at 12:01 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> >> I can reproduce Your problem only If I change datetime some files by
> >> hand.
>
> > Are you using ext3 or ext4?
>
> Yes, I'm using ext4 and ext3 and pbuilder and can't reproduce Your
> problem :)
What happens on my system is that build
>> I can reproduce Your problem only If I change datetime some files by
>> hand.
> Are you using ext3 or ext4?
Yes, I'm using ext4 and ext3 and pbuilder and can't reproduce Your
problem :)
--
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un..
On 20/04/12 at 10:24 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> severity 655801 important
> thanks
>
> I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
> >>
> >>> I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
> >>> we can see why lua is there for you but
severity 655801 important
thanks
I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
>>
>>> I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
>>> we can see why lua is there for you but not for me.
>>
>> I think that Your filesystem is a cause for Your
On 20/04/12 at 00:32 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > On 19/01/12 at 03:07 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> >> severity 655801 important
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
>
> > I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
> On 19/01/12 at 03:07 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>> severity 655801 important
>> thanks
>>
>> I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
> I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
> we can see why lua is there for you but not for me.
I think that
severity 655801 serious
thanks
On 19/01/12 at 03:07 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> severity 655801 important
> thanks
>
> I can't reproduce the bug. So I reduce severity level.
I can. Please post a build log including dependencies installation, so
we can see why lua is there for you but not
On 14/01/12 at 17:48 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> >> tags 655801 unreproducible moreinfo
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I can't reproduce the bug. I've just built the package using pbuilder.
> >> It is built fine. Also debian's buildd server built the package
> >> recently, too.
>
> >
>> tags 655801 unreproducible moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I can't reproduce the bug. I've just built the package using pbuilder.
>> It is built fine. Also debian's buildd server built the package
>> recently, too.
> Please post your build log and a diff between your build log and mine.
Y
On 14/01/12 at 12:07 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> tags 655801 unreproducible moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> I can't reproduce the bug. I've just built the package using pbuilder.
> It is built fine. Also debian's buildd server built the package
> recently, too.
Please post your build log an
tags 655801 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi!
I can't reproduce the bug. I've just built the package using pbuilder.
It is built fine. Also debian's buildd server built the package
recently, too.
> Source: tarantool
> Version: 1.4.4+20111229+2-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: de
Source: tarantool
Version: 1.4.4+20111229+2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
16 matches
Mail list logo
