On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 08:29 +, Mike McClurg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 01/31/2012 03:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 06:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>> + Note that if you wish to use Xen with XCP (Xen Cloud Platform), then
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 03:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 06:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> + Note that if you wish to use Xen with XCP (Xen Cloud Platform), then using
>>> + xl is mandatory.
>>
>> As I've said before I don't
On 01/31/2012 03:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 06:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> + Note that if you wish to use Xen with XCP (Xen Cloud Platform), then using
>> + xl is mandatory.
>
> As I've said before I don't think this is correct. The correct value if
> you are using X
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 06:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> + Note that if you wish to use Xen with XCP (Xen Cloud Platform), then using
> + xl is mandatory.
As I've said before I don't think this is correct. The correct value if
you are using XCP is "xapi" or "xe" or however you decide to word it.
On 01/20/2012 04:28 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> I can also see that being difficult to implement in a way that won't
> break existing installations on upgrade. Also, it would be nice to
> allow the various toolstacks to coexist on the filesystem, and be able
> to switch in between them without having
On 01/20/2012 04:56 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Am I wrong here
>> again? :)
>>
>> Can you comment on my grep -v solution?
>
> Why not have a look at one of the undoubtedly many packages which
> already does this?
Attached to this mail is a version that keeps eventual comments an admin
has put in
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> If I might make a proposal, I think things would be simpler for everyone if
> we put the separate toolstacks into separate conflicting packages. Then we
> don’t have to deal with /etc/defaults or debconf or user configuration at
> all, and e
If I might make a proposal, I think things would be simpler for everyone
if we put the separate toolstacks into separate conflicting packages.
Then we don’t have to deal with /etc/defaults or debconf or user
configuration at all, and each toolstack would know to shut itself down
when it got uninst
On 01/17/2012 07:49 AM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:
> I actually ran into a problem very similar to this myself this morning - it
> came from the fact that the init scripts were reordered at some point, and I
> still had the old init script ordering.
>
> I sorted it temporarily by starting the script
On 01/10/2012 04:26 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
>
> Thanks for your bug reports. It's really cool to see that there's
> already some people using the XCP packages we worked on since last
> summer, and even more to see that some of them are DDs! :)
>
> I wonder, what is trying to connec
On 01/10/2012 11:24 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: xcp-xapi
> Version: 1.3-15
> Severity: normal
>
> My packages were initially installed from the deb repository at
> download.xensource.org.
> Eventually, I upgraded them to the debian repository ones.
>
>
> Right now, xcp-xapi fails to
11 matches
Mail list logo
