Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-09 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> > I was hoping to ship at most one package per version. There's simply > > no way that ftpmasters are going to allow shipping a single manpage in > > each package. My original thought was gcc-manpages, but if you'd > > prefer a single package per version, I can do that, too. > > fine too. but f

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
On 01/09/2012 08:22 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:29:08PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 01/07/2012 08:51 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: >>> Do you have a preference on the name of the package? >> >> what about {cpp,gcc,g++,gfortran}-4.x-man? > > I was hoping to ship at

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-09 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:29:08PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 01/07/2012 08:51 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > > Do you have a preference on the name of the package? > > what about {cpp,gcc,g++,gfortran}-4.x-man? I was hoping to ship at most one package per version. There's simply no way th

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
On 01/07/2012 08:51 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > Do you have a preference on the name of the package? what about {cpp,gcc,g++,gfortran}-4.x-man? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-07 Thread brian m. carlson
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:28:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > we have the original man pages in non-free (at least we had these packaged for > earlier versions [1]; feel free to package these, I assume Nikita would > welcome > the help). These are far better than anything written from scratch

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-07 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On 01/07/2012 05:36 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are > >> not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate > >> package if you intend to mai

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 01/07/2012 05:36 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are >> not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate >> package if you intend to maintain thes

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-07 Thread brian m. carlson
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > won't fix in the gcc-4.6 package; clearly these "skeletal" pages are > not part of the upstream sources. please package those as a separate > package if you intend to maintain these on a regular basis. Lots of Debian packages includ

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-06 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 654931 + wontfix thanks On 01/06/2012 11:12 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > Package: gcc-4.6 > Version: 4.6.2-11 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > gcc-4.6 and company are missing manpages. I am aware that this is a > result of the upstream manpages being non-free. > Since policy require

Bug#654931: gcc-4.6: missing manpage

2012-01-06 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4.6.2-11 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch gcc-4.6 and company are missing manpages. I am aware that this is a result of the upstream manpages being non-free. Since policy requires a manpage for each binary, I am including a skeletal manpage that covers some of the most co