Bug#654350:

2014-06-03 Thread Ignacio Areta
I think this bug should be closed as obsolete. NPAPI plugins aren't supported anymore starting with Chromium 35. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

Bug#654350: chromium: Wrongly warns about lightspark "Flash plugin" being out-of-date.

2012-08-29 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, I first thought that chromium was using some online resource to figure out which flash version was out of date but then I noticed that --- chrome.pak 2012-08-29 13:22:15.0 + +++ /usr/lib/chromium/chrome.pak 2012-08-29 13:24:45.0 + @@ -22331,7 +22331,7 @@

Bug#654350: chromium: Wrongly warns about lightspark "Flash plugin" being out-of-date.

2012-08-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, I saw the same issue today with gnash and chromium. First I was really confused and wondered if I had accidentally installed adobe flash. Here's a screencast: http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/screencast/chromium-adobe1.ogv I think it is very confusing that about:plugins shows "GNU SWF Player" but t

Bug#654350: chromium: Wrongly warns about lightspark "Flash plugin" being out-of-date.

2012-01-03 Thread Didier Raboud
Package: chromium Version: 16.0.912.63~r113337-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Forwarded: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=108962 Hi, as described in the upstream bugreport, chromium as currently available in sid, when browser-plugin-lightspark is installed, warns about it bei