On 03/01/12 21:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think the below is a more correct fix. Could you check whether it
> works for you?
Hi Peter,
Your suggestion builds okay on kfreebsd-i386, it prevents the
-Wformat-security warning, and it runs fine.
I've copied your patch and mine to upstream to s
I think the below is a more correct fix. Could you check whether it
works for you?
--- a/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c
+++ b/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c
@@ -4058,7 +4058,7 @@ oncore_log (
snprintf(Msg, sizeof(Msg), "ONCORE[%d]: %s", instance->unit,
msg);
- syslog(log_level, M
On 31/12/11 20:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
>> build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
>
> Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
Hi,
I saw it written th
On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
> build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On 30/12/11 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> ntp is now failing to build on the kfreebsd-* arches.
Argh! I had the wrong version of the source package. Most of the fixes
in my last mail are already applied (as per #542721, #627403) -- but
there are two places where some (apparently kfreebsd-sp
Package: src:ntp
Version: 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi!
ntp is now failing to build on the kfreebsd-* arches. Some code is
failing the -Wformat-security build hardening test, and this is being
treated as an error during b
6 matches
Mail list logo
