Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228:

2012-01-07 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:43:14AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 22:28 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > > > True. You can either: > > > > (a) depend on libboost1.48-dev, then update when 1.49 comes out; or > > (b) depend on libboost-dev, implicitly promising compatib

Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228:

2012-01-06 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 22:28 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > True. You can either: > > (a) depend on libboost1.48-dev, then update when 1.49 comes out; or > (b) depend on libboost-dev, implicitly promising compatibility with > all versions of boost, past and present > a) is ugly es

Bug#653228: Transition status

2012-01-03 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, Please see Bug#653823 -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228:

2012-01-03 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hallo, > > Isn't it the usualy procedure to file a RC bug to prevent transistion to > testing? Yes, that's correct. In the case of the recent boost-defaults issue, it was a problem in unstable itself. So I had to revert it. > The

Bug#653228:

2012-01-01 Thread Tobias Frost
Hallo, Isn't it the usualy procedure to file a RC bug to prevent transistion to testing? The problem I see is that I cannot reliablly set a build-depend or library dependency for upstream versions >1.48 coldtobi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228: boost-defaults: libboost-*-dev 1.48.0.2 depend on libboost-*1.46-dev

2011-12-25 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:57:58AM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote: > I see now, but then we have a problem. The semantics of libboost-*-dev > have always been, at least this was my understanding, to depend on the > latest stable version of boost. Yes, that's the basic purpose of the defaults.

Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228: boost-defaults: libboost-*-dev 1.48.0.2 depend on libboost-*1.46-dev

2011-12-25 Thread Thomas Krennwallner
Hi Steve, On Sun Dec 25, 2011 03:58:23PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 05:59:56PM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote: > > Source: boost-defaults > > Severity: important > > > > Hi! > > > > When I try to install, e.g., libboost-filesystem-dev 1.48.0.2,

Bug#653228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#653228: boost-defaults: libboost-*-dev 1.48.0.2 depend on libboost-*1.46-dev

2011-12-25 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 05:59:56PM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote: > Source: boost-defaults > Severity: important > > Hi! > > When I try to install, e.g., libboost-filesystem-dev 1.48.0.2, the > dependencies forces to install libboost-filesystem1.46-dev. See also the > control fi

Bug#653228: boost-defaults: libboost-*-dev 1.48.0.2 depend on libboost-*1.46-dev

2011-12-25 Thread Thomas Krennwallner
Source: boost-defaults Severity: important Hi! When I try to install, e.g., libboost-filesystem-dev 1.48.0.2, the dependencies forces to install libboost-filesystem1.46-dev. See also the control file of boost-defaults: Package: libboost-filesystem-dev [...] Section: libdevel Depends: ${misc: