Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-06-17 Thread Dave Steele
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> postinst should be able to setup ~piupartss/.ssh/known_hosts from /etc/ssh > > that's a good idea, recording it in TODO. even if only for localhost :) > You should do one or the other, if

Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-06-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Dave, On Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, Dave Steele wrote: > Patches are laid out by issue in server-fixup. Squashed in > piuparts-server. I split out dh_install - debian/tmp, and laid out the > -report changes more logically (which led to more cleanup in there). > There are still some mixing of issue

Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-06-12 Thread Dave Steele
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> I have this staged. Look right? > > yup! :-) > > pushed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-06-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I think you deserve some more comments :) On Sonntag, 10. Juni 2012, Dave Steele wrote: > > - please keep the package in 1.0 format. 3.0 is more complicated and buys > > us nothing as we dont have any patches. > > I don't understand why 3.0 (native) is more complicated. It gives you more ro

Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-06-12 Thread Holger Levsen
tags 652934 - patch thanks Hi Dave, please _rebase_ and reformat your patches. Your branch currently has stuff like this: 7650ca0 Create a piuparts-server package out of the merged piatti.git files 7bc9779 Use '1.0' format for the packages this should be merged into one. If I look at the bran

Bug#652934: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#652934: Bug#652934: status

2012-05-30 Thread Dave Steele
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I've just cherry-picked 89926a72e5675218abfbbd6dce50dba0292c43ad and then > stopped at 4da7f074ba4d8bba26def132831d64b31fa6c9c8 as you added a new cron > file without deleting the old ones. Which I like in a way, as it allows me to > keep t