Steffen Winterfeldt wrote...
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>
> >Steffen Winterfeldt wrote...
> >
> >>Thanks! But shouldn't it be 'mov %%rbx,%%rdi' etc, then?
> >
> >Hm, why? cpuid affects only the lower 32 Bits. Using %rbx instead
> >shouldn't do harm, though.
>
> No, the result
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Steffen Winterfeldt wrote...
Thanks! But shouldn't it be 'mov %%rbx,%%rdi' etc, then?
Hm, why? cpuid affects only the lower 32 Bits. Using %rbx instead
shouldn't do harm, though.
No, the result is zero-extended to 64 bits in 64bit-mode.
Steffen
Steffen Winterfeldt wrote...
> Thanks! But shouldn't it be 'mov %%rbx,%%rdi' etc, then?
Hm, why? cpuid affects only the lower 32 Bits. Using %rbx instead
shouldn't do harm, though.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Michael Prokop wrote:
tags 652146 + pending
forwarded 652146 snw...@suse.de
thanks
Cc-ing Steffen Winterfeldt as being upstream of hwinfo, he might be
interested in this issue + patch as well. Dear Steffen, full details
are available in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
tags 652146 + pending
forwarded 652146 snw...@suse.de
thanks
Cc-ing Steffen Winterfeldt as being upstream of hwinfo, he might be
interested in this issue + patch as well. Dear Steffen, full details
are available in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652146
* Christoph Biedl [Mon Jan
5 matches
Mail list logo