Am 19.11.2012 15:36, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
We may have got different opionions about it, okay.
The problem is not building fglrx on this combination (easy patchable),
but that it is working (from the closed source part of fglrx).
Since AMD also do not want to support it in any way it is the be
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 10:11 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 18.11.2012 21:33, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> >> fglrx will never work on this crap mix of amd64 kernel and i386
> >> userland, but there is no working conflicts which could be added
> >
> > It's not crap, it's a generally supported and us
Am 18.11.2012 21:33, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
fglrx will never work on this crap mix of amd64 kernel and i386
userland, but there is no working conflicts which could be added
It's not crap, it's a generally supported and useful configuration. If
fglrx-modules-dkms:amd64 was installable on i386 w
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 09:13 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 12.12.2011 06:04, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> > Package: fglrx-modules-dkms
> >
> > Version: 1:11-11-3
> > Severity: important
> >
> > The i386 version of this package includes only the 32-bit build of the
> > proprietary driver code. If
Am 12.12.2011 06:04, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
Package: fglrx-modules-dkms
Version: 1:11-11-3
Severity: important
The i386 version of this package includes only the 32-bit build of the
proprietary driver code. If the target kernel is 64-bit (e.g. the
Debian amd64 flavour), the driver fails to bui
5 matches
Mail list logo
