Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2012-01-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > > >> Hmm, shouldn't version 2.1.8+nomsvcrt be safe to keep? > > > > > > You tell me. > > > > Yes, it is safe

Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2012-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> Hmm, shouldn't version 2.1.8+nomsvcrt be safe to keep? > > > > You tell me. > > Yes, it is safe to keep. Sorry for the confusion. Specifically, 2.1.8+nomsvcr

Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2012-01-24 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Hmm, shouldn't version 2.1.8+nomsvcrt be safe to keep? > > You tell me. Yes, it is safe to keep. Sorry for the confusion. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2012-01-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Seems that fell a bit through the cracks. Done now. It seems that > > 2.1.10 and 2.1.12 were also affected. > > > > I removed the orig.tar.gz and the binaries build from the source but > > left the .dsc and diff.gz/debia