Hi Quanah,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:35:50PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> OpenLDAP was compiled using 5.1.25, and the libs were updated to
> 5.1.29. OpenLDAP *must* be recompiled against 5.1.29 as well in that
> case. If that is done, then everything will move along happily.
> This is by
--On Monday, December 12, 2011 10:54 PM +0100 Julien Cristau
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 13:35:50 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
OpenLDAP was compiled using 5.1.25, and the libs were updated to
5.1.29. OpenLDAP *must* be recompiled against 5.1.29 as well in that
case. If that is done,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 13:35:50 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> OpenLDAP was compiled using 5.1.25, and the libs were updated to
> 5.1.29. OpenLDAP *must* be recompiled against 5.1.29 as well in that
> case. If that is done, then everything will move along happily.
>
> This is by design bec
--On Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:14 PM +0100 "stor...@club-internet.fr"
wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.25-4+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I think that the openldap package was not compiled with the last
version :
bdb_back_initialize: BDB library version mismatch: expected Berk
--On Monday, December 12, 2011 1:29 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:14 PM +0100 "stor...@club-internet.fr"
wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.25-4+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I think that the openldap package was not compiled with the last
5 matches
Mail list logo
