Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:53:33PM -0800, Fred Moyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Niko Tyni wrote: > > FWIW, we're configuring the beast with > > > >  perl Makefile.PL                INSTALLDIRS=vendor \ > >                MP_USE_GTOP=1 \ > > Is gtop desired for any particular reaso

Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Niko Tyni wrote: > FWIW, we're configuring the beast with > >  perl Makefile.PL                INSTALLDIRS=vendor \ >                MP_USE_GTOP=1 \ Is gtop desired for any particular reason? I would think production machines may not want it enabled by default.

Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:49:40AM -0800, Fred Moyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Hi Fred (and hopefully the list), > > Looks like it made it through. If you say so, but it doesn't show up in any web accessible archives or news.gmane.org so I suspect that was j

Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

I'm afraid the details are not clear to me either, but I have tried the two patches out (after correcting an instance of code-before-declaration which VC++ doesn't accept in C files) and I find that (with the LimitExcept change reverted as per current svn Trunk) they make no visible difference t

Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > Hi Fred (and hopefully the list), Looks like it made it through. Suggest inlining your patches next time instead of using attachments, sometimes the list code may filter on those. > > as seen in , we're seeing nu

Bug#650675: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: mod_perl-2.0.6 RC1

> Please download, test, and report back on this release candiate. Hi Fred (and hopefully the list), as seen in , we're seeing numerous lines of Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0x7f9c0c347490, Perl interpreter: 0x7f9c0c1a2dd0 during global destruction. on