On 17/09/13 03:13, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Just a warning here: I am a novice in Java-land (I wrote a toy compiler in
> Java in 1998, but that sincerely doesn't count, as I can't remember a thing
> and the language changed a lot).
>
> That being said, I may, perhaps, spend some time with it, as man
Hi there.
On Sep 07 2013, Andrew Ross wrote:
> My intention was always to package Gephi under the banner of the Java
> team. Unfortunately the Netbeans platform is a dependency, and getting
> that in a good state (and keeping up with upstream releases) has been
> more challenging than I initially
Hi all,
My intention was always to package Gephi under the banner of the Java
team. Unfortunately the Netbeans platform is a dependency, and getting
that in a good state (and keeping up with upstream releases) has been
more challenging than I initially expected. When I started on this, the
only Ne
Hi there again.
On Sep 02 2013, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I wonder if, somehow, changing to team-maintenance wouldn't be better for
> the package overall? Perhaps the highly skilled people that already package
> Java things for Debian may be interested in this? I'm CCing them.
>
> Otherwise, changin
Hi there.
On Mar 04 2013, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Hi, apparently there is a proper Debianised effort (adhering to Debian's
> dyn-link and source licensing requirements) going on:
>
> http://wiki.gephi.org/index.php/Specification_-_Debian_Package
>From a quick look at that, I see that there are very f
Hi, apparently there is a proper Debianised effort (adhering to Debian's
dyn-link and source licensing requirements) going on:
http://wiki.gephi.org/index.php/Specification_-_Debian_Package
I've CC'd the person in charge of that page here.
Andy, could you give us an update on how this is going?
6 matches
Mail list logo
