-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/09/2012 09:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> I (personally) would be willing to accept the lists under the following
>> conditions:
>>
>> Before the list is created I want an
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:49:46PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> aren't two a bit too much?
My rationale for two: I don't think we want 1-man-band companies on the
list. They do a wonderful service, but they are more suitable for
consultants (that already have a list) than for larger companies th
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Monday, den 09. January 2012:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I (personally) would be willing to accept the lists under the
> > following conditions:
> >
> > Before the list is created I want an exact policy who is allowed to
> >
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I (personally) would be willing to accept the lists under the
> following conditions:
>
> Before the list is created I want an exact policy who is allowed to
> get subscribed to this list.
Here is a first draft of such a policy.
F
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Montag, den 19. Dezember 2011:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:32:55PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > I've provided a tentative answer for this in my first mail, but I'm not
> > > sure it's compatible with the way listmasters work. To bootstrap the
> > > system, woul
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Montag, den 19. Dezember 2011:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Ok I had a longer talk to Michael Meskes and I am now able to
> > understand you (and his) position a little bit better.
> >
> > I (personally) would be willing to ac
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:57:41PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > 1) how is the non-openness of this request any different from the
> >listmaster@lists.d.o mail alias (or many others that we have in many
> >@*.debian.org domains, fwiw) that Cord has Cc:-ed?
> >
> >(Note: as I've ment
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Ok I had a longer talk to Michael Meskes and I am now able to
> understand you (and his) position a little bit better.
>
> I (personally) would be willing to accept the lists under the
> following conditions:
Thanks. Before answeri
On 12/13/2011 03:33 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Ok I had a longer talk to Michael Meskes and I am now able to understand you
> (and his) position a little bit better.
What about adding a longer explanation to the bug report then? Especially why
Debian should host a yet another closed list while w
Hallo! Du (Michael Meskes) hast geschrieben:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Technically we can. And at least for lists I sometimes have to (debugging
> > and
>
> Sure, but that's different from the whole world reading all the emails. And of
> course I trust
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Technically we can. And at least for lists I sometimes have to (debugging and
Sure, but that's different from the whole world reading all the emails. And of
course I trust you guys not to read all the emails or else I wouldn't use m
Michael Meskes schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. Dezember 2011:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I hope we do not need to discuss the need for a private listmaster
> > alias. People who want to discuss their privacy issues or other troubles
> > with lists don't want
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I hope we do not need to discuss the need for a private listmaster
> alias. People who want to discuss their privacy issues or other troubles
> with lists don't want to do that in public for sure. And we have similar
> mail aliases wh
On 12/13/2011 04:13 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:21:32AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> while I like the idea of the list, I do not like (even with your
>> explanation) the idea of having a non-public list for discussing
>> Debian-related stuff in private - one of the main
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Before the list is created I want an exact policy who is allowed to get
> subscribed
> to this list.
Fine with me. That makes sense.
> A better description of the list should be done that leads into a press
> announcement that i
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:21:32AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> while I like the idea of the list, I do not like (even with your
> explanation) the idea of having a non-public list for discussing
> Debian-related stuff in private - one of the main priciples of Debian is
> to be open and we should
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Sonntag, den 11. Dezember 2011:
> Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Sunday, den 11. December 2011:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:10:07PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > I was working on this bug and I detected the non openess part. And I
> > > have to say that I strong
* Stefano Zacchiroli [2011-11-26 13:01 +0100]:
> Name: debian-compan...@lists.debian.org
>
> Description:
>
> Discussion about the needs of companies that contribute to, offer
> commercial support for, or have other strategic interests in Debian
>
> Category: Miscellaneous Debian
It would be g
Hi,
On 11/26/2011 01:01 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Name: debian-compan...@lists.debian.org
[..]
> Description:
>
> Discussion about the needs of companies that contribute to, offer commercial
> support for, or have other strategic interests in Debian
>
> Category: Miscellaneous Debian
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Sunday, den 11. December 2011:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:10:07PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I was working on this bug and I detected the non openess part. And I
> > have to say that I strongly disagree in making this list non-public.
> >
> > Am I the only on
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:10:07PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I was working on this bug and I detected the non openess part. And I
> have to say that I strongly disagree in making this list non-public.
>
> Am I the only one that don't likes this?
Thanks for working on this bug report and for
Hallo! Du (Alexander Wirt) hast geschrieben:
> I was working on this bug and I detected the non openess part. And I have to
> say that I strongly disagree in making this list non-public.
>
> Am I the only one that don't likes this?
I second this opinion.
Debian is about openess, and so we have
Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb am Saturday, den 26. November 2011:
> Package: lists.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Name: debian-compan...@lists.debian.org
>
> Rationale:
>
> I've been working in federating companies that have an interest in
> supporting
> Debian in various ways. The kind
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 01:01:34PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Package: lists.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Name: debian-compan...@lists.debian.org
Just in case is needed, I hereby second the creation of this new mailing list.
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Name: debian-compan...@lists.debian.org
Rationale:
I've been working in federating companies that have an interest in supporting
Debian in various ways. The kind of support here varies from stuff already
partially covered by the Debian partners
25 matches
Mail list logo
