On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Michael Richardson wrote:
> The point is not to make it not-archived, the point is to delay the
> archive while the group figures out what's it's policy is. If some
> participants archive it and post it, oh well. It's not like it's
> wikileaks.
First, if anyone is going to be
> "Cord" == Cord Beermann writes:
>> I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not
>> publically archived. It may be that group will become
>> comfortable with having the archive visibility delayed by a month
>> or more, such that all conversations do come out,
Hallo! Du (Michael Richardson) hast geschrieben:
> I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not publically
> archived. It may be that group will become comfortable with having the
> archive visibility delayed by a month or more, such that all
> conversations do come out, or perhap
I am in favour of the list.
I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not publically
archived. It may be that group will become comfortable with having the
archive visibility delayed by a month or more, such that all
conversations do come out, or perhaps not. I think that during
4 matches
Mail list logo
