Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-06-04 Thread Aron Xu
Hi, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Harshula wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:43 +1000, Harshula wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> > @Harshula, >> > Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has >> > been removed from archive, and I've reques

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-06-04 Thread Harshula
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:43 +1000, Harshula wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > > @Harshula, > > Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has > > been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, > > scim-uim and scim-hangul jus

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org,

2012-05-05 Thread Aron Xu
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:15:47AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> @Harshula, >> Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has >> been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, >> scim-uim and scim-hangul

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-05-02 Thread Harshula
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > @Harshula, > Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has > been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, > scim-uim and scim-hangul just now. I think it's time to orphan > scim-m17n if you plan to