Hello,
2013/6/7 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
> Hector,
> this hasn't landed in current kernel.org git, did you submit it upstream?
No, I did not submit it upstream, also it seems to be incomplete, and
it misses armhf architecture. Please, allow me few days to work on it
and re-submit updated patch to De
reassign 649748 src:linux
thanks
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:18:16PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> found 649748 linux-2.6/2.6.39-3
> tags 649748 + upstream
> quit
>
> Hi Hector,
>
> Hector Oron wrote:
>
> > Do you think is sane to send this patch to upstream?
>
> Yep, sounds like the sane t
found 649748 linux-2.6/2.6.39-3
tags 649748 + upstream
quit
Hi Hector,
Hector Oron wrote:
> Do you think is sane to send this patch to upstream?
Yep, sounds like the sane thing to do. Based on MAINTAINERS (ok, I
already knew, but let's pretend for a moment), the mailing list to
write to is l
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hello,
I was not sure where to send this patch, better here to Debian community for
review.
I found a bit annoying that using upstream deb-pkg target does not allow me
to create
proper Debian packages when cross compiling, so I have cre
4 matches
Mail list logo
