Dear Josselin,
thanks for your answer. I agree with you in one point: This seems to be
wasting time.
It's not about metapackages or nut, this is a substantial question. But we
are on controversy roads. As said, the (meta)packages gnome is essential
and one of the most installed.
Try to remove to
Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 00:20 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
> That's an non-logical abstraction. Following this the metapackage could be
> dependend on everything.
Sure. Feel free to package a “everything” metapackage, that depends on
all packages in Debian. It should come very handy.
> Bu
Dear Josselin Mouette,
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
> Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 18:15 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
>> Josselin Mouette schrieb:
>> > Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 13:32 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
>> >> The dependency of gnome on totem-mozilla violates Debian Policy
>> (3
Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 18:15 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette schrieb:
> > Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 13:32 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
> >> The dependency of gnome on totem-mozilla violates Debian Policy (3.5),
> >
> > Are you serious?
>
> Absolutely: "Every pac
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
> Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 à 13:32 +0100, Oliver Rompcik a écrit :
>> The dependency of gnome on totem-mozilla violates Debian Policy (3.5),
>
> Are you serious?
Absolutely: "Every package must specify the dependency information about
other packages that are REQUIRED
Package: gnome
Version: 1:2.30+7
Severity: normal
The dependency of gnome on totem-mozilla violates Debian Policy (3.5), as
totem-mozilla is NOT required for gnome to run properly. This annoying wrong
dependency has been reported since 2006 and is not yet fixed. Should be altered
to Recommendat
6 matches
Mail list logo
