tag 649173 + pending
thanks
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 19:48 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> The package was uploaded. Thanks.
and accepted earlier this evening. :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead; thanks.
The package was uploaded. Thanks.
--
-- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tags 649173 + confirmed
thanks
On 20.01.2012 14:45, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
A debdiff would be great, just for final checks; thanks.
Attached is a debdiff for 0.7.15+squeeze1 which includes all three
changes as discussed.
Please go ahe
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A debdiff would be great, just for final checks; thanks.
Attached is a debdiff for 0.7.15+squeeze1 which includes all three
changes as discussed.
Thanks,
--
-- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
diff -Nr
On 20.01.2012 10:16, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> To be clear, there are three changes up for consideration:
>
> (1) is #645599 which is essentially:
>
http://arthurdejong.org/viewvc/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd-0.7/debian/libnss-ldapd.con
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > To be clear, there are three changes up for consideration:
> >
> > (1) is #645599 which is essentially:
> >
> > http://arthurdejong.org/viewvc/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd-0.7/debian/libnss-ldapd.config?r1=1209&r2=1555
> > (2) is a
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 22:26 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 13:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > If the two further changes included in the debdiff from
> > <1324994307.2556.15.ca...@sorbet.thuis.net> are resovled in unstable (if
> > appropriate) then I'd be happy to look
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 13:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If the two further changes included in the debdiff from
> <1324994307.2556.15.ca...@sorbet.thuis.net> are resovled in unstable (if
> appropriate) then I'd be happy to look at including those in a stable
> update. I have to admit that,
On 15.01.2012 08:47, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Any chance you could consider an upload with *just* the above change
(and a changelog entry), and without the version change noise in the
rest of your diff?
I could do this but the other two fun
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Any chance you could consider an upload with *just* the above change
> (and a changelog entry), and without the version change noise in the
> rest of your diff?
I could do this but the other two functional changes, although not
affecting m
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 15:08:16 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
[...]
> diff -Nru nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.15/debian/libnss-ldapd.config
> nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.16/debian/libnss-ldapd.config
> --- nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.15/debian/libnss-ldapd.config 2010-09-24
> 09:07:12.0 +0200
> +++ nss-pa
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:08 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that
> fixes a bugs that apparently locks some users out of their system. The
> bug itself is not a regression in 0.7.15 but it is triggered in some
> cases by the stable upd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release team,
I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that
fixes a bugs that apparently locks some users out of their system. The
bug itself is not a regres
13 matches
Mail list logo
