On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 14, "luke.leighton" wrote:
>
>> which unfortunately doesn't help anyone who has a dreamplug which
>> comes shipped as standard with a 2.6.32 <= .35 kernel. especially on
> Not a showstopper, look at check_kernel_features() in preins
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Steev Klimaszewski
wrote:
> Adding in the accept4 syscalls isn't hard at all. They were added in
> 2.6.32, they just weren't wired up until 2.6.36 (for arm) - Eudev handles a
> kernel that doesn't have accept4, udev claims it needs something newer than
> 2.6.32,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 14, "luke.leighton" wrote:
>
> > which unfortunately doesn't help anyone who has a dreamplug which
> > comes shipped as standard with a 2.6.32 <= .35 kernel. especially on
> Not a showstopper, look at check_kernel_features() in prei
On Feb 14, "luke.leighton" wrote:
> which unfortunately doesn't help anyone who has a dreamplug which
> comes shipped as standard with a 2.6.32 <= .35 kernel. especially on
Not a showstopper, look at check_kernel_features() in preinst.
IIRC I can just add accept4 as well to the list there.
--
Adding in the accept4 syscalls isn't hard at all. They were added in
2.6.32, they just weren't wired up until 2.6.36 (for arm) - Eudev handles a
kernel that doesn't have accept4, udev claims it needs something newer than
2.6.32, if you add the accept4 wiring up, you can just edit the udev check
fo
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> "luke.leighton" writes:
>
>> ok thanks marco. does anyone know what this is referring to? would
>> it be the accept4 syscall as shown in dmitri's patch:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=68;filename=udev-182.patch;att=2;b
"luke.leighton" writes:
> ok thanks marco. does anyone know what this is referring to? would
> it be the accept4 syscall as shown in dmitri's patch:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=68;filename=udev-182.patch;att=2;bug=648325
according to git accept4 has been added into 2.6.3
ok thanks marco. does anyone know what this is referring to? would
it be the accept4 syscall as shown in dmitri's patch:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=68;filename=udev-182.patch;att=2;bug=648325
this is a long-standing issue, it would be good to have it sorted out.
i had to t
8 matches
Mail list logo
