On Nov 10, 2011 3:57 PM, "Dominique Belhachemi" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> >> Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
> >>
> >> Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drma
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
>> Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
>>
>> Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
>> field. Both packages offer a dr
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
>
> Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
> field. Both packages offer a drmaa implementation.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have them a
Package: drmaa
Version: 0.4~b3
Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
field. Both packages offer a drmaa implementation.
Thanks
Dominique
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
4 matches
Mail list logo