On Nov 24 2011, tony mancill wrote:
> Alexandre, are things working for you again?
Yes, I hear the sound again. Thanks for the prompt fixing. I think this
bug can be closed now...
> Cheers,
> tony
Cheers, Alexandre
--
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:11:53 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > I suggest to close this with version 1.2-12 if the two of you also
> > have sound again.
> Thank you for testing - I'm still in the midst of trying to cobble
> together an i386 system running sid. The upload of 1.2-12 included (2)
> chan
On 11/22/2011 11:54 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:07:14 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
Off-topic: recently it stoped playing things (there's no
timidity option in the sound output configuration.
>>> Indeed, I also have no sound and a rather empty sound configuratio
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:07:14 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >> Off-topic: recently it stoped playing things (there's no
> >> timidity option in the sound output configuration.
> > Indeed, I also have no sound and a rather empty sound configuration
> > dialog. - This was still working 1.5 weeks ag
Hi there!
On Nov 03 2011, gregor herrmann wrote:
> [It would be nice to have an unversioned xulrunner meta package ...]
I just filed a bug (wishlist, in fact) to xulrunner asking for that
unversioned metapackage, to solve this and adblock-plus dependency
problem. You may check that bugreport at
[Forwarding to the shiny new cloned bug :)]
- Forwarded message from tony mancill -
From: tony mancill
To: gregor herrmann , 647...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#647542: tuxguitar: xulrunner dependency
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:01:33 -0800
CC: Alexandre Lymberopoulos
On 11/10/2011
On 11/10/2011 02:43 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> Off-topic: recently it stoped playing things (there's no
>> timidity option in the sound output configuration.
>
> Indeed, I also have no sound and a rather empty sound configuration
> dialog. - This was still working 1.5 weeks ago ...
Interestin
clone 647542 -1
found -1 1.2-11
retitle -1 tuxguitar: no more sound output
severity -1 normal
thanks
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:42:28 -0200, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> > [It would be nice to have an unversioned xulrunner meta package ...]
> For sure! Is it possible, who is the one to ask for th
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> [It would be nice to have an unversioned xulrunner meta package ...]
For sure! Is it possible, who is the one to ask for this?
About tuxguitar on testing I've pinned it to be downloaded from
unstable. Off-topic: recently it stoped playing t
On 11/03/2011 01:15 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:03:35 -0200, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
>
>> I would like to ask to make tuxguitar depende on any current
>> (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) version of xulrunner
>> package. It seems very redundant to have xulrunner
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:03:35 -0200, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> I would like to ask to make tuxguitar depende on any current
> (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) version of xulrunner
> package. It seems very redundant to have xulrunner-6.0 and
> xulrunner-9.0 at the same time, the former
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-11
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I would like to ask to make tuxguitar depende on any current
(stable/testing/unstable/experimental) version of xulrunner package. It seems
very redundant to have xulrunner-6.0 and xulrunner-9.0 at the same time, the
former
12 matches
Mail list logo
