Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
I'm closing this issue since Jessie is about to be released and the
backport to Squeeze is unlikely to happen now.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I'm looking into two different approaches for packaging ActiveMQ on
Debian Squeeze; the first approach is just to make an internal binary
only package from the upstream and the second approach is to try and
pick up where this bug left off. Was
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:52:07 +0100, "Damien Raude-Morvan"
wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 novembre 2011 23:17:04, Micah Anderson a écrit :
> > I would like to use activemq on squeeze. Would you consider a backport for
> > squeeze-backports?
>
> There has been discussion last month on debian-backpor
Hi Micah,
Le mercredi 02 novembre 2011 23:17:04, Micah Anderson a écrit :
> I would like to use activemq on squeeze. Would you consider a backport for
> squeeze-backports?
There has been discussion last month on debian-backport about this [1].
> I'd be happy to do the backport, if you do not wis
Package: activemq
Version: 5.5.0+dfsg-4
Severity: wishlist
I would like to use activemq on squeeze. Would you consider a backport for
squeeze-backports?
I'd be happy to do the backport, if you do not wish to do so.
Thanks,
micah
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
5 matches
Mail list logo