Daniel Baumann (29/12/2012):
> the purpose of live-installer is to be able to use d-i to install
> live-images. like i said, if that fails (by an original bug in
> live-installer or by lacking a workaround in live-installer for
> something else in d-i), it's serious.
On the d-i front, we're not t
Daniel Baumann writes:
> On 12/30/2012 12:09 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
>> you should contribute it to the bug before you continue with this
>> childishness
>
> right, i don't contribute.. *sigh*
I did NOT say you don't contribute.
I was using the word "contribute" as a synonym for "provide", so
On 12/30/2012 12:09 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> you should contribute it to the bug before you continue with this
> childishness
right, i don't contribute.. *sigh*
i've had enough of this, i'm out. i've removed myself from uploaders,
feel free to do whatever you want, i don't care anymore.
--
Ad
Daniel Baumann writes:
> On 12/30/2012 08:11 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> this bug is not release critical as it doesn't fit the definition
>> of "serious".
>
> it is severity serious as explained. if you don't want it to be RC
> (which is not the same as downgrading its severity), get a
> whee
On 12/30/2012 08:11 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> this bug is not release critical as it doesn't fit the definition
> of "serious".
it is severity serious as explained. if you don't want it to be RC
(which is not the same as downgrading its severity), get a
wheezy-ignore tag.
--
Address:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> release and that it's not planned to happen in 2012, I'll be fine with
s/2012/2014
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> since you put yourself into uploaders of live-installer some time ago,
> maybe you want to look at it yourself too?
You know the reasons for this: be able to do l10n upload when needed
without them to be considered NMUs. That's
On 12/29/2012 10:33 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> As Christian said, it's not just a bug "in live-installer", but "with
> crypted volume", which makes it much less grave.
the purpose of live-installer is to be able to use d-i to install
live-images. like i said, if that fails (by an original bug in
On 12/29/2012 10:10 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Which probably explains why you haven't done anything since
> September, I guess.
i for my part have clearly said publicly many times when i'm going to
work on live-installer parts (when the other live-* parts are done,
that is), so that's no surp
Daniel Baumann, le Sat 29 Dec 2012 20:16:57 +0100, a écrit :
> On 12/29/2012 0502 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
> > for a precise set of installation types, those not being the most
> > common, particularly when people use the
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> severity 646704 serious
> thanks
>
> On 12/29/2012 0502 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
> > for a precise set of installation types, those not being the most
>
severity 646704 serious
thanks
On 12/29/2012 0502 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
> for a precise set of installation types, those not being the most
> common, particularly when people use the Live CD to install.
a bug in live-in
severity 646704 important
thanks
This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
for a precise set of installation types, those not being the most
common, particularly when people use the Live CD to install.
Downgrading to "important" as per the definition of "improtant" seve
13 matches
Mail list logo
