-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/12 11:11, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:17:25 -0500, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
>> Too much drama. Some users are familiar with Atheme's stance on
>> packaging, so you'll be asked to not package Atheme by just about
>> anybody. Af
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:17:25 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Too much drama. Some users are familiar with Atheme's stance on
> packaging, so you'll be asked to not package Atheme by just about
> anybody. After so much time has passed it would be important to
> re-affirm permission and also determin
On 03/20/12 17:01, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:35:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik
> wrote:
>> http://mikemestnik.net/debian/atheme-services/
>>
>> Fully usable package, needs mentor and upstream permission.
The current state of the pkg needs a licensee review. I'm working to
bring the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:35:31 -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> http://mikemestnik.net/debian/atheme-services/
>
> Fully usable package, needs mentor and upstream permission.
I understood upstream has given permission for packaging, as noted in
the bug report:
"If you are planning to package Services
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://mikemestnik.net/debian/atheme-services/
Fully usable package, needs mentor and upstream permission.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAG
On 03/18/12 12:28, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Here is a ?partially? working .git tree containing a debian pkg for
> atheme-services_6.0.9.
>
> The atheme channel users were not nice to me so I want nothing more to
> do with them or there code. However I put some of my time into making
> this pkg and I'
Here is a ?partially? working .git tree containing a debian pkg for
atheme-services_6.0.9.
The atheme channel users were not nice to me so I want nothing more to
do with them or there code. However I put some of my time into making
this pkg and I'd like to see it make some one else happy.
I'll a
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:43:22 +, The Fungi wrote:
> When it comes time to submit this for inclusion into the archive,
> I'm definitely interested in reviewing and testing your package.
> While I'm not a DD and thus can't sponsor the upload, I am a user of
> atheme-services on Debian and have pa
When it comes time to submit this for inclusion into the archive,
I'm definitely interested in reviewing and testing your package.
While I'm not a DD and thus can't sponsor the upload, I am a user of
atheme-services on Debian and have packaged several versions of it
myself for use on my own IRC ser
To my knowledge there's no specific *policy* within Debian which
explicitly lays out how to deal with this particular circumstance in
detail. Common sense and courtesy, however, would dictate that you
abide by the wishes of the software's author(s) while possibly
engaging them in a civilized discus
It would help to know if the long-term-support concerns of upstream
have been dealt with since this program's removal last year:
http://bugs.debian.org/583327
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(fu...@yuggoth.org); FINGER(fu...@yuggot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Antoine Beaupré"
* Package name: atheme-services
Version : 6.0.0
Upstream Author : William Pitcock and others
* URL : http://www.atheme.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : modular IRC services
12 matches
Mail list logo
