David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >> > Recommends: libm17n-0 (>= [-1.5.0)-] {+1.6.3)+}
> >> The Recommends here is the bad thing:
> >
> > I have libm17n-0 1.6.2-3 installed. It should satisfy both the old
> > and the new Recommends since both are ">=" relationships. Right?
No. I w
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 23:37, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
>> >
>> > Depends: m17n-db (>= [-1.5.0)-] {+1.6.3)+}
>> > Description: [-a-] multilingual text processing library - contributed
>> > database
>>
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 15:37 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The Recommends here is the bad thing:
> > Currently libm17n-0 is only available in 1.6.2-3 -
> > this means with an upgrade of m17n-contrib now we would break
> > a previously satisfied Recommends which means the user might loose
> > functio
Hi David,
I have CC'd the m17n-contrib maintainer on this message too.
David Kalnischkies wrote:
> first of all: Thanks for your detailed bugreport!
Thanks! I tried to include the information that I would want when
receiving such a report.
> "Unfortunately" I have to say that this "new" behavi
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.15.9
Severity: normal
I have a very strange m17n-contrib package and apt-get upgrade
interaction. In an up to date Sid today with all other packages up to
date. apt-get won't offer m17n-contrib for an upgrade but only a
dist-upgrade. This can be recreated on my system
5 matches
Mail list logo
