On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:22:42PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>
> thank you for your comment and patch. I'm not really convinced your
> approach is the proper one, either. You mention yourself that the whole
> probing for udev shouldn't really be necessary, that's why I titled my
> previous mail
Roger,
thank you for your comment and patch. I'm not really convinced your
approach is the proper one, either. You mention yourself that the whole
probing for udev shouldn't really be necessary, that's why I titled my
previous mail "this needs more thought", to have a chance to understand
what the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:07:24AM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> thank you for the patch, but I'm afraid that approach is overly
> simplistic and not the proper fix, yet.
I've attached an alternative patch which will permit transition to
the new location. The old path should be removed after the
Peter,
thank you for the patch, but I'm afraid that approach is overly
simplistic and not the proper fix, yet.
First, as Michael mentioned, the file paths need to be updated to
properly deal with the transition. Alas, that will break lucid support
where /run does not exist. My main systems are
4 matches
Mail list logo
