On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:07:27PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-09-29 at 22:33 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Package: apt
> > > Version: 0.8.15.8
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > If I run apt-cache p
On tor, 2011-09-29 at 22:33 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.8.15.8
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > If I run apt-cache policy (without arguments), it takes milliseconds.
> > If I run it under a differ
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.8.15.8
> Severity: normal
>
> If I run apt-cache policy (without arguments), it takes milliseconds.
> If I run it under a different locale, e.g., LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy,
> it takes about 4 or 5 seconds
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.15.8
Severity: normal
If I run apt-cache policy (without arguments), it takes milliseconds.
If I run it under a different locale, e.g., LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy,
it takes about 4 or 5 seconds. There are some package build tools
that indirectly call apt-cache policy with
4 matches
Mail list logo