Hi!
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 11, Jacek Kawa wrote:
>
> > 2. if I delete 61-dev-root-link.rules and restart, this
> > file is recreated before write_dev_root_rule is run
> > (and in consequence correct /dev/root is not created).
> I do not understand how this could be possible since the fi
On Oct 11, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> 2. if I delete 61-dev-root-link.rules and restart, this
> file is recreated before write_dev_root_rule is run
> (and in consequence correct /dev/root is not created).
I do not understand how this could be possible since the file is not
supposed to survive a reboot
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Here it goes (as in udev 172-1):
> I know what is in that file.
> You need to find out why it's not working for you.
OK, after some investigation:
1. write_dev_root_rule works just fine if I comment
out: [ ! -e $RUNDIR/rules.d/61-dev-root-link.rules ]
Ie. previous version
On Oct 02, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> Here it goes (as in udev 172-1):
I know what is in that file.
You need to find out why it's not working for you.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 30, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> > > > 11 1 8:1 / / rw,noatime - ext4 /dev/root
> > > > rw,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,commit=600,barrier=1,data=ordered
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 wrz 22 21:24 /dev/root -> sda2
>
> Have a look at /lib/udev/write_dev_root_rule and fin
On Sep 30, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> > > 11 1 8:1 / / rw,noatime - ext4 /dev/root
> > > rw,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,commit=600,barrier=1,data=ordered
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 wrz 22 21:24 /dev/root -> sda2
Have a look at /lib/udev/write_dev_root_rule and find out what is wrong
with it.
--
cia
reassign 643318 udev
retitle 643318 /dev/root symlink points to the wrong device
thanks
On 30.09.2011 08:04, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> On 29.09.2011 18:59, Jacek Kawa wrote:
>>> 11 1 8:1 / / rw,noatime - ext4 /dev/root
>>> rw,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,commit=6
'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 29.09.2011 18:59, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> > 11 1 8:1 / / rw,noatime - ext4 /dev/root
> > rw,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,commit=600,barrier=1,data=ordered
> And
> ls -l /dev/root
> ?
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 wrz 22 21:24 /dev/root -> sda2
weird...
Regards
On 29.09.2011 18:59, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> 11 1 8:1 / / rw,noatime - ext4 /dev/root
> rw,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,commit=600,barrier=1,data=ordered
And
ls -l /dev/root
?
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 27.09.2011 10:11, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> > grub-probe behaviour changed after upgrade from 1.98+20100804-14
> > to 1.99-rc1 (I could have not investigated it at that time), and
> > this change persists in 1.99-12.
> >
> Can you post the output of
On 27.09.2011 10:11, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> grub-probe behaviour changed after upgrade from 1.98+20100804-14
> to 1.99-rc1 (I could have not investigated it at that time), and
> this change persists in 1.99-12.
>
Can you post the output of cat /proc/self/mountinfo ?
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phco
Package: grub-common
Version: 1.99-12
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
grub-probe behaviour changed after upgrade from 1.98+20100804-14
to 1.99-rc1 (I could have not investigated it at that time), and
this change persists in 1.99-12.
In the 1.98*:
#grub-probe -t device /boot/grub
/dev/sda1
12 matches
Mail list logo
