Bug#643255: proguard package

2013-06-06 Thread tony mancill
On 06/06/2013 09:51 AM, Sam Clegg wrote: > On 06/05/2013 09:24 PM, tony mancill wrote: >> Hello Sam, >> >> Would you be opposed to an NMU of proguard to update it to a newer >> version and to address the FTBFS error? Or perhaps to the packaging >> being moved to collaborative maintenance under the

Bug#643255: proguard package

2013-06-06 Thread Sam Clegg
On 06/05/2013 09:24 PM, tony mancill wrote: > Hello Sam, > > Would you be opposed to an NMU of proguard to update it to a newer > version and to address the FTBFS error? Or perhaps to the packaging > being moved to collaborative maintenance under the Debian Java team? > > The current version is

Bug#643255: proguard package

2013-06-05 Thread tony mancill
Hello Sam, Would you be opposed to an NMU of proguard to update it to a newer version and to address the FTBFS error? Or perhaps to the packaging being moved to collaborative maintenance under the Debian Java team? The current version is blocking the transition to OpenJDK7. Thank you, tony