On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ariel wrote:
In any case, changing the version that Wordpress advertises is IMO a
serious risk of breaking random plugins that verify the current
version...
Not the internal version number, which would have this risk. The
nu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ariel wrote:
> You don't need them to. If you change the version number (add a
> suffix) then it won't match the number google is looking for and
> google won't do anything. You don't need google to change any code.
OK, might be.
> >In any case, changing the version that Word
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Ariel wrote:
Google sends out alerts warning site owners if their version of
wordpress is out of date, because of the risk of security issues.
However debian already handles the security issues even on old versions,
so there is
tag 642301 + wontfix
thanks
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Ariel wrote:
> Google sends out alerts warning site owners if their version of
> wordpress is out of date, because of the risk of security issues.
>
> However debian already handles the security issues even on old versions,
> so there is no reason
Package: wordpress
Version: 3.0.5+dfsg-0+squeeze1
Severity: wishlist
Google sends out alerts warning site owners if their version of wordpress is
out of date, because of the risk of security issues.
However debian already handles the security issues even on old versions, so
there is no reason f
5 matches
Mail list logo
