Bug#641975: RM: openssl098

2011-09-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 01:12:01AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 26/09/2011 22:32, Kurt Roeckx ha scritto: > > Why do you tag it with moreinfo? > > There are several rdepends which I wanted to look at, first. > > > And are you really going to wait until all packages are fixed > > before remov

Bug#641975: RM: openssl098

2011-09-30 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 26/09/2011 22:32, Kurt Roeckx ha scritto: > Why do you tag it with moreinfo? There are several rdepends which I wanted to look at, first. > And are you really going to wait until all packages are fixed > before removing it? I'm mostly worried about some packages currently in testing (see http

Bug#641975: RM: openssl098

2011-09-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:15:13AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > tags 641975 + moreinfo Why do you tag it with moreinfo? And are you really going to wait until all packages are fixed before removing it? This transition already started almost 6 months ago. People really have had plenty of time

Bug#641975: RM: openssl098 -- RoM; No longer needed

2011-09-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the openssl098 source package from unstable. It was a transitional package to be able to move to openssl 1.0.0. I know that some packages still depend on it, but they all have had RC bugs filed against them for several months. The package contains known sec