Thanks for explaining the difference between "should" and "must" to me!
It was the English version, which is not my native language. Still, I should
have read better.
Best wishes,
Guido
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:03 +0200, Guido van Steen wrote:
> Dear Adam,
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > Violations of "should" directives in policy are not RC bugs.
>
> You are the release manager, so you must be right about this.
:-) Or need convincing as to
Dear Adam,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Violations of "should" directives in policy are not RC bugs.
You are the release manager, so you must be right about this.
However, I was guided by reportbug, which told me that violations of
"should" directives are serious. I
severity 641203 normal
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 11:25 -0400, Guido van Steen wrote:
> Package: olpc-powerd
> Version: 23-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.1
Violations of "should" directives in policy are not RC bugs.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Package: olpc-powerd
Version: 23-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.1
See subject
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
5 matches
Mail list logo
