Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 19:56 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > AIUI, the if-up.d script is really just a bandage that deals with the > case where nmbd exits because, when it's launched, there are no network > interfaces that are up. Come to think of it... how does the samba package on Ubuntu handle this?

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 11:01 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > > When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' > > changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via > > systemctl rat

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sam, On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' > changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via > systemctl rather than directly) in a way that breaks the if-up.d script. > I've m

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-06 Thread Sam Morris
Package: samba Version: 2:3.6.0-1 Severity: normal When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via systemctl rather than directly) in a way that breaks the if-up.d script. I've modified the script to get