On Mar 13 Sep 2011 04:06:12 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
> Just FYI. *.cmake files have been moved to paraview-dev, if you take
> the latest from git.
> What is left to do is:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/paraview.git;a=
> blob;f=debian/TODO;h=9c6efbc305b8
2011/9/12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
> [snip]
>> > Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the
>> > transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview
>> > should be filled a normal
On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
> > Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the
> > transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview
> > should be filled a normal bug, raised to important in ~3 or 4 weeks and
> > then
Lisandro,
2011/9/11 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió:
>> I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
>> paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
>
> That sounds like a very bad decision. Heade
On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió:
> I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
> paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
That sounds like a very bad decision. Header files should be provided by the
-dev package.
This allows a us
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
