Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-24 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> Yesterday (as I said) I connected to upstream and today the patch has >> been uploaded in upstream [1] and tagged as new version [2]. So I >> think it must be buildable on all architectures now. >> >> I upladed these changes to svn.d.o. :) > Looks good. > Any other thing you want to update? I

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > Yesterday (as I said) I connected to upstream and today the patch has > been uploaded in upstream [1] and tagged as new version [2]. So I > think it must be buildable on all architectures now. > > I upladed these changes to svn.d.o. :)

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-23 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> In attache You can find new patch for #638814. >> Please reinclude the module again. > Thanks, but main reason for 'removing' was, it was breaking nginx on > some arch. See: #649061 for more details. If you test new chunk module > can solve this, we can add. Hi, Kartik, agian! Yesterday (as

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-23 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> These modules are nessesary for my job, so I think I will able to >> maintain them in acceptable state :) >> Lets reinclude the module again? >> >> Unfortunately I didn't know about 649061 :( otherwise I could include >> myself in the problem earlier :( > Go ahead. Ok. I've included the modu

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-23 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > Please show me a log for the other architecture. Because the log from > 649061 was reproducible on my amd64 system, so I've just upgraded > version. For example: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nginx&arch=powerpc&ver=1.1

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-23 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
>> I've reopened 638820 by mistake. Sorry. > No issue, since you closed it :) >> In attache You can find new patch for #638814. >> Please reinclude the module again. > Thanks, but main reason for 'removing' was, it was breaking nginx on > some arch. See: #649061 for more details. If you test new

Bug#638814: Patch

2011-11-23 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > I've reopened 638820 by mistake. Sorry. No issue, since you closed it :) > In attache You can find new patch for #638814. > Please reinclude the module again. Thanks, but main reason for 'removing' was, it was breaking nginx on some a