Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Backtrace code for ARM EABI has been added in glibc 2.11 [1], and is
> based on unwind information. -funwind-tables is therefore necessary to
> get it working, and then backtrace() is fully functional.
>
> I therefore don't see the need to tag this bug as wontfix.
Sure,
# Restoring original tags and severity
severity 637360 normal
tag 637360 - upstream
tag 637360 - wontfix
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:15:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> severity 637360 wishlist
> retitle 637360 [arm] backtrace() requires unwind information
> # unlikely to be fixed any t
severity 637360 wishlist
retitle 637360 [arm] backtrace() requires unwind information
# unlikely to be fixed any time soon
tags 637360 + upstream wontfix
quit
Hi Stéphane,
Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> #include
>
> int main() {
> void *buffer[100];
> return backtrace(buffer, 100);
> }
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the
following program:
#include
int main() {
void *buffer[100];
return backtrace(buffer, 100);
}
returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3 everywhere I've
4 matches
Mail list logo
