Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-23 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 17.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think. Let the fun begin. > > Here is a first round of removal requests from testing for packages

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Michael Biebl wrote: > Here is a first round of removal requests from testing for packages involved > in the libpanel-applets transition: > > gnome-main-menu #638094 > orca #638112 (will be updated in GNOME 3.2 to work without libgail-module) > accerciser #638112 (will be

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a >> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition > > Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think. Let the fun begin

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:49:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > >> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a > >> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a >> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition > > Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think. Let the fun begin

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-12 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/12/2011 10:51 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:38:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a >>> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition >

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:38:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a > > slot to start the nautilus 3 transition > > Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a > slot to start the nautilus 3 transition Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think. Let the fun begin. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Michael Biebl wrote: > I would consider non-functioning automount for a (short) period of time as > acceptable compromise, but ymmv. The "short" only holds if the rest of GNOME 3 is ready as well, which you seem to question yourself later on. > > With everything more or

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 15.08.2011 22:26, schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > > The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which > > > sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus (which is > > > far from trivial). > > > > I'd

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2011 16:42, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> - Updating evince from 2.32 to 3.0 involves a soname bump of libevince3 → >> libevince3-3. The only rdep of libevince3 is python-evince >> (src:gnome-python-desktop). python-evince has

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which > > sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus (which is > > far from trivial). > > I'd rather just have automount support broken temporarily, t

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2011 16:42, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> - Updating evince from 2.32 to 3.0 involves a soname bump of libevince3 → >> libevince3-3. The only rdep of libevince3 is python-evince >> (src:gnome-python-desktop). python-evince has

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2011 14:58, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > Hi, > > Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 15:11 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : >> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a >> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition > > Sorry for chiming in after being not-so-active for a wh

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > - Updating evince from 2.32 to 3.0 involves a soname bump of libevince3 → > libevince3-3. The only rdep of libevince3 is python-evince > (src:gnome-python-desktop). python-evince has been deprecated, so there is no > update for GNOME

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 15:11 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a > slot to start the nautilus 3 transition Sorry for chiming in after being not-so-active for a while, but I’m afraid this transition cannot be done, as thin

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.08.2011 15:11, schrieb Michael Biebl: > I've filed corresponding bug reports for the affected packages: > > brasero > deja-dup > diff-ext > eiciel > evince > file-roller > gksu > gnome-disk-utility > gnome-user-share > gtkhash > nautilus-actions > nautilus-dropbox > nautilus-filename-repaire

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a slot to start the nautilus 3 transition The API of libnautilus-extension hasn't changed with version 3.0, but it