On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:31:41AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Thanks for the patch and sorry if it has been difficult to get an
> overview of how the whole machinery. :)
Hi,
I've attached a new patch, and will comment point by point below.
> I got two issues with the patch; first off, the r
On 2011-08-14 18:58, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> tags 636994 +patch
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Okay, I had a stab at implementing this. It involved a lot of guesswork
> and cargo-culting, but it appears to work. Patch attached. Pl
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Thanks for the response; I think you've convinced me that this would
> be the best approach, at least to start with.
>
> You're correct that build-time deps will be caught by rebuilds, once
> the modules get removed. Ideally in
tags 636994 +patch
thanks
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Thanks for the response; I think you've convinced me that this would
> be the best approach, at least to start with.
>
> You're correct that build-time deps will be caught by rebuilds, once
> the modul
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 04:35:59PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-08-07 15:33, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > The perl 4 libraries are more interesting; there are 127 packages
> > which appear to have files which use one or more of them. In many cases
5 matches
Mail list logo
