Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-11-05 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster wrote: > David Baron wrote: > >> On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 10:32:41 Norbert Preining wrote: >>> On Mi, 03 Aug 2011, David Baron wrote: >>> > % 0 0 595 842 is the right bounding box that most applications expect >>> > % for A4. Since dvips always rounds up, choose something slightly >

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-09 Thread David Baron
On Monday 08 Av 5771 21:45:40 Frank Küster wrote: > Hi David, > > Frank Küster wrote: > > David Baron wrote: > >> File only contains the cruft. > > > > Aha. > > > > And what about (as root) > > > > sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-base.postinst > postinst.lg 2>&1 > > Any news on this? > > R

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-08 Thread Frank Küster
Hi David, Frank Küster wrote: > David Baron wrote: > >> File only contains the cruft. > > Aha. > > And what about (as root) > > sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-base.postinst > postinst.lg 2>&1 Any news on this? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung VCD

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-05 Thread Frank Küster
David Baron wrote: > File only contains the cruft. Aha. And what about (as root) sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-base.postinst > postinst.lg 2>&1 Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg Debian Developer (TeXL

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-05 Thread David Baron
On Friday 05 Av 5771 10:31:29 Frank Küster wrote: > David Baron wrote: > > I do NOThave an /etc/ucf directory, so I make one > > and placed the two lines init. > > Okay. > > > There is nothing in the dpkg.lg (IGNORE all the cruft which I wish I knew > > how to eliminate) different than before.

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-05 Thread Frank Küster
David Baron wrote: > I do NOThave an /etc/ucf directory, so I make one > and placed the two lines init. Okay. > There is nothing in the dpkg.lg (IGNORE all the cruft which I wish I knew how > to eliminate) different than before. That cruft means your system is, hm, strange. Maybe that is th

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-04 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fr, 05 Aug 2011, David Baron wrote: > dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 966 package > 'dd-rescue': > missing architecture YOur installation seems to be seriously hosed ... did you recently had a hard disk crash or turned of the computer without shutting down? Most

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-04 Thread David Baron
On Thursday 04 Av 5771 23:42:26 Frank Küster wrote: > David Baron wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 22:43:13 Frank Küster wrote: > >> > No idea. How do I get the correct one installed? > >> > >> dpkg -i --force-confnew > >> /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-13_all.deb > >> > >> should w

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-04 Thread Frank Küster
David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 22:43:13 Frank Küster wrote: >> > No idea. How do I get the correct one installed? >> >> dpkg -i --force-confnew >> /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-13_all.deb >> >> should work if the file is still there. If it doesn't, there's a >> differ

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-04 Thread David Baron
On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 22:43:13 Frank Küster wrote: > > No idea. How do I get the correct one installed? > > dpkg -i --force-confnew > /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-13_all.deb > > should work if the file is still there. If it doesn't, there's a > different problem (either in ucf or

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-03 Thread Frank Küster
David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 10:32:41 Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Mi, 03 Aug 2011, David Baron wrote: >> > % 0 0 595 842 is the right bounding box that most applications expect >> > % for A4. Since dvips always rounds up, choose something slightly >> > smaller. >> > >> > @ A4s

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-03 Thread David Baron
On Wednesday 03 Av 5771 10:32:41 Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mi, 03 Aug 2011, David Baron wrote: > > % 0 0 595 842 is the right bounding box that most applications expect > > % for A4. Since dvips always rounds up, choose something slightly > > smaller. > > > > @ A4size 594.99bp 841.99bp > > @+

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-03 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 03 Aug 2011, David Baron wrote: > % 0 0 595 842 is the right bounding box that most applications expect > % for A4. Since dvips always rounds up, choose something slightly smaller. > > @ A4size 594.99bp 841.99bp > @+ ! %%DocumentPaperSizes: a4 > @+ %%PaperSize: A4 That is NOT the config.p

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread David Baron
On Tuesday 02 Av 5771 23:34:50 Frank Küster wrote: > David Baron wrote: > >> paperconf > > > > a4 > > > >> texconfig-sys pdftex paperconf > > > > No paper known with height 297mm and width 210mm > > Known units are mm and in, decimal separator is `.' > > Maybe height and width have been exchang

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
unmerge 636328 severity 636328 normal found 636328 2009-13 thanks David Baron wrote: > Package: texlive-base > Version: 2009-12 > Severity: normal > next try for debian control. H. -- sigfault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread Frank Küster
David Baron wrote: >> paperconf > a4 >> texconfig-sys pdftex paperconf > > No paper known with height 297mm and width 210mm > Known units are mm and in, decimal separator is `.' > Maybe height and width have been exchanged? Hm, 297mm and 210mm are the proper dimensions for a4. The "known" paper

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread David Baron
On Tuesday 02 Av 5771 22:11:04 Frank Küster wrote: > unmerge 636328 636304 > retitle 636328 libpaper script ist non-functional and prints garbage > thanks > > David Baron wrote: > > Package: texlive-base > > Version: 2009-12 > > Severity: normal > > > > --- Please enter the report below this lin

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread Frank Küster
unmerge 636328 636304 retitle 636328 libpaper script ist non-functional and prints garbage thanks David Baron wrote: > Package: texlive-base > Version: 2009-12 > Severity: normal > > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Replacing "return 0" with "exit 0" did not help mine. > Runnin

Bug#636328: [texlive-base] Correcting syntax did not help

2011-08-02 Thread David Baron
Package: texlive-base Version: 2009-12 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Replacing "return 0" with "exit 0" did not help mine. Running this script manually kick about the mm sizes of A4 paper. Paperconf seems to work OK, however. Specifying -m in the five calls did