* Ben Finney , 2011-07-09, 11:38:
Would it be okay to depend on ‘rst2man’ instead?
Hmm, actually I wanted to drop rst2man as well…
This has happened, rst2man virtual package is gone.
I will remove docutils-writer-manpage at the next docutils upload, at
which point this bug will become RC.
On 08-Jul-2011, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Ben Finney , 2011-07-08, 10:22:
> >Would it be okay to depend on ‘rst2man’ instead?
>
> Hmm, actually I wanted to drop rst2man as well…
I think it makes sense to keep the ‘rst2man’, ‘rst2odt’, and other packages
like ‘rst2pdf’; it help dependent packages that
* Ben Finney , 2011-07-08, 10:22:
docutils-writer-manpage is a virtual package provided by
python-docutils. I'd like to drop it at some point.
I agree with dropping that virtual package.
Could please build-depend on python-docutils (>= 0.6) instead? Thanks!
Would it be okay to depend on ‘rs
On 07-Jul-2011, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> docutils-writer-manpage is a virtual package provided by python-docutils.
> I'd like to drop it at some point.
I agree with dropping that virtual package.
> Could please build-depend on python-docutils (>= 0.6) instead? Thanks!
Would it be okay to depend on ‘r
Source: gracie
Version: 0.2.11-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
docutils-writer-manpage is a virtual package provided by
python-docutils. I'd like to drop it at some point. Could please
build-depend on python-docutils (>= 0.6) instead? Thanks!
--
Jakub Wilk
diff -Nru gracie-0.2.11/debian/cont
5 matches
Mail list logo