On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Michal Pokrywka wrote:
>> I had the same problem when I upgraded to 2.6.38 vanilla (and
>> currently at 2.6.39.1), but I can't remember what the last successful
>> version was (probably greater than 2.6.32). My syslog was full of the
>> WARN_ON trace from sch_hfsc.
After bisecting 2.6.39.1 it turned out that the bug is caused independently by
two patches:
commit b262a5da755cc6ed0cb4fba230cd9bf4037e1096
sch_sfq: fix peek() implementation
and
commit 9df49f2bfe862573911a080c75a6d81113c5c81d
sch_sfq: avoid giving spurious NET_XMIT_CN signals
Reverting thes
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 01:28 +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
> That warning that gets triggered when next_time == 0 in
> hfsc_schedule_watchdog() implies, that hfsc_dequeue() tried to dequeue a
> packet, but no leaf had anything eligible for scheduling (realtime
> criterion) and linksharing was upperli
Through serveral days my friend has done some tests with kernels 2.6.39.x
2.6.39.1, 2.6.39.2 and 2.6.39.3 are still affected.
2.6.39 (debian version 2.6.39-1 from http://snapshot.debian.org/binary/?cat=l)
works for several hours without triggering the bug. If it persist for some hours
more we wil
On 11-07-11 17:07, 00bor...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops - my logs are again filled with the WARN_ON from
net/sched/sch_hfsc.c:1427. Sorry for the confusion, it looks like
"initialize parent's cl_cfmin properly in init_vf()" is not to blame.
Ah, ok then. It would be really weird if that was the actua
Oops - my logs are again filled with the WARN_ON from
net/sched/sch_hfsc.c:1427. Sorry for the confusion, it looks like
"initialize parent's cl_cfmin properly in init_vf()" is not to blame.
This is an amd64 system. Vanilla kernel.org kernel except with fglrx
(the amd/ati radeon proprietary driver
Not sure if its relevant but it seems that the ones that reported the
issue either use IFB or IMQ devices.
In my case, I use IMQ.
François.
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 14:11 +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
> Missed explanation behind the change:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg139383.html
>
Missed explanation behind the change:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg139383.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
W dniu 11.07.2011 11:26, François Delawarde pisze:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having the same HFSC issues as described here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631945
>
> Some user reports that he made it work by reverting this patch:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds
9 matches
Mail list logo
