On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-08-12 at 01:27pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > > If you cannot live with others applying such tiny changes to your
>> > > pet packages, you shouldn't have them team-maintained!
>
On 11-08-12 at 01:27pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> People, please lets keep it civil.
Certainly. IF that remark was addressed to me, I would appreciate
having it spelled out how I failed to do so (in private email if you
prefer - I ask to honestly learn, not to discuss or claim innoscence).
> On
People, please lets keep it civil.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> You say that "It is beneficial to Debian to keep package dependencies
>> as simple as possible." Generally I agree, but I'd also say it is even
>> more benefical to try as hard as possible not to break th
On 11-08-12 at 09:27am, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Your first argument was to blame the user for not using aptitude for
> upgrades. This turned out as bullshit, because even aptitude does not
> remove packages that still satisfy dependencies.
I apologize for adding irrelevant and distracting nois
Am 11.08.2011 19:12, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
My god, how can one be so ignorant and disrespectful as to not listen to
the arguments put forward (or ask if those are not understood).
Talking about arguments, I have two arguments in the form of users
that have reported real issues with the mor
Am 11.08.2011 11:34, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
No.
All versions (available in Debian) indeed satisfies the package needs.
My god, how can one be so stubborn!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On 11-08-11 at 11:24am, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 08.08.2011 09:38, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> >Does your proposed change to debian/pycompat fix it? If yes, just
> >apply the change and let's be done with it.
>
> There was already a XS-Python-Version field in debian/control that
> said "all",
On 11-08-08 at 11:07am, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 08.08.2011 10:44, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >We do not solve this issue by educating Debian packages more widely
> >about weird possible combinations of packages: Debian support
> >upgrades one stable release at a time - Debian do *not* suppo
Am 08.08.2011 10:44, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
We do not solve this issue by educating Debian packages more widely
about weird possible combinations of packages: Debian support upgrades
one stable release at a time - Debian do *not* support keeping around
old packages!
It is exact this point th
On 11-08-08 at 09:38am, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mo, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:19:52 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> > Am 07.08.2011 13:08, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >> I therefore see no reason to elevate this particular to be a
> >> general issue for Debian.
> >
> > I do. Are you fine with e
On Mo, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:19:52 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 07.08.2011 13:08, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> I therefore see no reason to elevate this particular to be a general
>> issue for Debian.
>
> I do. Are you fine with escalating this issue on -devel?
Does your proposed change to d
On 11-08-08 at 09:19am, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 07.08.2011 13:08, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >I therefore see no reason to elevate this particular to be a general
> >issue for Debian.
>
> I do. Are you fine with escalating this issue on -devel?
Not exactly "fine" - I find it annoying, but
Am 07.08.2011 13:08, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I therefore see no reason to elevate this particular to be a general
issue for Debian.
I do. Are you fine with escalating this issue on -devel?
- Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On 11-08-06 at 12:38pm, A. Costa wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:23:20 +0200
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > Closing *again* as a non-bug.
>
> I follow, but here's my 2 cents from userland...
>
> If a 'python2.3' package existed in the current Debian distros, then
> this bug could be moved to t
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:23:20 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Closing *again* as a non-bug.
I follow, but here's my 2 cents from userland...
If a 'python2.3' package existed in the current Debian distros, then
this bug could be moved to that package. No 'python2.3' package
currently exists in De
Am 28.07.2011 19:35, schrieb A. Costa:
For the record, I've had this same install bug for about a month, even
when installing with 'aptitude':
[...]
So the bug is real enough. Last month F. Greffrath advised:
Adding ">= 2.4" in debian/pycompat
Assuming that would help, why not do it?
J
Package: morituri
Version: 0.1.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #630787
For the record, I've had this same install bug for about a month, even
when installing with 'aptitude':
% aptitude install morituri ; echo $?
The following NEW packages will be installed:
morituri
0 p
17 matches
Mail list logo
